Frank Aquila's Blog

August 17, 2017

The Democrat KKK Double Standard

Filed under: Uncategorized — frankaquila @ 4:31 pm

The Democrat KKK Double Standard

Martin Luther King stated, “I look to a day when people will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.”  No race is superior to another; but the Democrat party has tried to link President Trump and his supporters to the KKK without looking into their own mirror and history.

KKK Grand Wizard William Quigg donated and endorsed Hillary Clinton for president in March 2016 while Trump has disavowed any ties to the KKK.  Trump stated all organizations of hate are unacceptable. This includes the KKK, Antifa, or Black Lives Matter, which uses their name as a mask to incite violence with political and racial tension.

Let’s look at the facts of the KKK.

The Democrat party created the KKK to fight against equal rights for blacks after Republican President Abraham Lincoln won the Civil War.  No Democrat voted for the 14th Amendment to grant citizenship to blacks.  The KKK was honored at every Democrat National Convention from 1868 through the 1930’s.

Several prominent Democrats were KKK members including President Harry Truman; Hugo Black, who was appointed by Franklin D. Roosevelt to the Supreme Court from 1937-1971.

Democrat Majority Leader, Robert Byrd, who was not only a KKK member; but a Grand Keagle, a recruiter for the KKK signed up members for $10 a head.  He joined because it “offered excitement,” and because the Klan was an effective force in “promoting American values.”  He stated in a letter, “The Klan is needed today as never before, and I am anxious to see its rebirth…. in every state in the nation.” Byrd became the Democrat leader of the U.S. Senate and served from 1951-2010 and filibustered the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

In the 1960’s Martin Luther King, a Republican, fought against the Democrats, ultimately sacrificing his life for his dream of equality. It was Republicans and a black Republican by the name of A. Phillip Randolph, who organized King’s March on Washington in 1963, which was opposed by Democrat President John F. Kennedy, who used the FBI to target King while Attorney General Robert Kennedy, Democrat, used wiretapping to spy on Martin Luther King.

Remember Governor George Wallace?   Democrat.  Bull Connor?  Democrat.  They supported slavery and were the ones turning water hoses and dogs on black protesters in the 1960s

Democrat President Lyndon B. Johnson, who as a senator, also fought against the Civil Rights Act in 1957, was also known as a racist. Yet, he realized “negroes” “were getting pretty uppity these days.” LBJ continued, “Now, we’ve got to do something about this, we’ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference.” After Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act, he stated to two governors on Air Force One, “I’ll have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.”

As recently as the 1980s, Senator Ernest Hollings, Democrat of South Carolina, publicly referred to blacks as “darkies” and Hispanics as “wetbacks” without suffering any punishment from his party.

In 1983, Republican President Ronald Reagan signed into law Martin Luther King Day as a national holiday.  However, in 1985, then-Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton, Democrat, signed Act 985 into law, making the birthdates of Martin Luther King and Robert E. Lee, the general who led the Civil War Confederate Army, state holidays on the same day in Arkansas.

On May 5, 1993, Clinton praised ex-Arkansas Senator J. William Fulbright as “my mentor,” as he gave the nation’s highest civilian award – the Presidential Medal of Freedom – to a man who spent the vast majority of his public career and life as a proud segregationist, who voted against the 1964 and 1965 Civil Rights Acts.

I have no problem placing Civil War monuments in a Civil War museum; but there should not be a double standard.  Monuments of racists Democrats should be also be taken down and placed in their own Racist Democrat Museum.

Frank Aquila is president of the South San Joaquin Republicans and author of the book, “Sarah Palin Out of Nowhere”.  He can be emailed at


June 23, 2017

Trump – Russian Collusion is Fake News

Filed under: Uncategorized — frankaquila @ 8:59 pm

The Democrats and their associates in the media have been trying desperately to paint a picture of Russian collusion with Trump during the election to set grounds for impeachment.

Senator Marco Rubio paraphrased a quote from Donald Trump to former FBI Director James Comey stating, “Can you please tell the American people what these leaders in congress already know, what you already know, what you told me three times that I am not personally under investigation.” Comey agreed with the paraphrase replying, “Yes sir” confirming that Trump was not under investigation.

Rubio continued to ask Comey, “Did you ever wonder why of all the things in this investigation, the only thing that has never been leaked is the fact that the president was not personally under investigation, despite the fact that both Democrats and Republicans and the leadership of congress knew that and have known for weeks.” Comey replied, “I don’t know.”

Individual(s) left behind from the Obama administration have been anonymous sources spreading to the media “fake news” as well as feloniously unmasking Americans from intelligence surveillance, such as General Mike Flynn.

When Comey was asked about the report from the NSA, FBI, and CIA that concluded that there was “no evidence in our report” that member of the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians, Comey responded that the report was correct.

Despite no evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign, the media and Democrats continue to paint this picture even though Democrats are forced to admit they have no evidence of collusion.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who recommended the firing of Comey to Trump, then appointed Robert Mueller, a former FBI Director, to head a Special Counsel to oversee the FBI investigation into Russian election interference, including any potential links between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Robert Mueller, who is supposed to conduct his investigation independently, who is a friend of Comey, has appointed “independent prosecutors” on his Special Counsel who are evidently biased against Trump.

The National Law Journal reported Mueller has hired Michael Dreeben, who donated to Obama in 2008 and Hillary Clinton in 2006.

Mueller hired Andrew Weissmann, who donated six times to Obama’s presidential campaign as well as the DNC in 2006.

Mueller hired Jeannie Rhee, who as recently as 2015 represented the Clinton Foundation to block FOIA requests relating to ties to the Department of State and racketeering. She has also donated to the DNC as well as the Obama campaign in 2008 and 2011 and Clinton’s campaign in 2015 and 2016.

Mueller also hired James Quarles who has a long history of donating to Democrats from 1987 through 2016 and also donated to Hillary in 2016.

A Special Counsel should be “independent” and include collusion between Hillary Clinton and the Russians for selling 20% of American uranium to the Russians for millions donated to the Clinton Foundation as well as hundreds of thousands Bill Clinton received for the Russians.

The Special Counsel should also look into Obama’s interference into the election in Israel when American tax dollars were given to the opposition party to influence the election against Benjamin Netanyahu.

Maybe the Special Counsel can investigate Obama’s Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, who told Comey to refer to Hillary Clinton’s email investigation only as a “mater.”

We should have a Special Counsel look into the murder of Seth Rich, who was the DNC leaker to Wikileaks.

In the end, this Special Counsel is filled with those who would rather lay the ground material against President Trump for their Democrat friends to begin an impeachment against him even though the real criminals were the ones the Special Counsel supported on the Democrat side.

Frank Aquila is the president of the South San Joaquin Republicans and author of the book, “Sarah Palin Out of Nowhere.” He can be emailed at

May 19, 2017

Special Counsel of Trump a good thing for Trump

Filed under: Uncategorized — frankaquila @ 3:26 pm

Special Counsel of Trump a good thing for Trump

Since the election of Donald Trump as president, Democrats have been trying to set the narrative that the Trump team colluded with the Russians to influence the election. The Democrats demanded a Special Counsel to look into these allegations to keep the narrative running and to place a dark cloud over Trump and the Republicans in their effort to persuade public opinion in order to win back Congress, the U.S. Senate, and ultimately the White House.

So far there has been no evidence of any ties between the Trump team and the Russians. James Clapper, Obama’s Director of National Intelligence (DNI) has stated on May 12, 2017 that the NSA, FBI, CIA, and his office “had no evidence of such collusion.” Democratic Senator Diane Feinstein (CA), who sits on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, stated that she hasn’t seen any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

While the Special Council seems like a “Witch Hunt” by Democrats delegitimize the Trump presidency, this is actually good for Trump. It puts the issue to rest and I suspect the result of the investigation will show there was no collusion, which is bad news for Democrats.

Trump and the Republicans should be calling for several other Special Counsels to investigate other criminal activity within the government including the illegal electronic surveillance by those in the Obama administration on the Trump team and those leaking such intelligence to the media. Several felonies were committed when individuals within the National Security Council, whom over sixty percent were appointed by Obama, illegally unmasked individuals within the Trump team violating their legal protection under privacy as American citizens and anonymously leaked those classified reports collected through a FISA warrant to the media. The media has used the private conversations between Russian Ambassadors as examples of collusion even though such conversations with ambassadors of various countries are normal. Feinstein admitted, “There are all kind of rumors around. There are newspaper stories, but that is not necessarily evidence.”

We should welcome Special Counsel to investigate collusion between Hillary Clinton and the Russians for selling 20% of American uranium to the Russians for the millions donated to the Clinton Foundation as well as the hundreds of thousands Bill Clinton received from the Russians in speaking fees.

We should have a Special Counsel for the $500,000 donated by the Clintons to Jill McCabe, who was running for the State Senate and is the wife of FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe, who was the official in charge of investigating the emails of Hillary’s private server. Can we say unethical and conflict of interest?

We should have a Special Counsel for Hillary’s private server with the 33,000 email and classified material leaked along with the private meeting of Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton on the tarmac of an Arizona airport. More conflict of interest.

We should have a Special Counsel for the murder of Seth Rich, who was the DNC leaker to Wikileaks.

We should have a Special Counsel for lies and cover-up of the murders in Benghazi. We should have a Special Counsel for the IRS scandal of targeting conservative organizations with the cover-up of destroying the email servers. We should have a Special Counsel for President Obama’s surveillance of Republican presidential candidates including Rand Paul and Marco Rubio. We should have a Special Counsel for the deaths of Veterans at the VA hospital during the Obama administration. We should have a Special Counsel for the deception of the Iran deal and the billions given to them from Obama. We should have a Special Counsel for Fast and Furious when the Obama administration sold weapons to the Mexican drug cartels that were used to kill two border patrol agents.

Special Counsels are good and there should be a lot of government people held responsible, including jail.  While the Special Counsel against Trump smells of a “Witch Hunt” based on trumped up information, this will put the issue to rest; but at the same time, other Special Counsels against the real criminals in Washington is another way to “Drain the Swamp.”

Frank Aquila is a Manteca resident and author of the book, “Sarah Palin Out of Nowhere.”  He can be emailed at

May 8, 2017

Democrats mislead people on Gas Tax

Filed under: Uncategorized — frankaquila @ 12:58 pm

California drivers pay more for gasoline than any other state. Yet, they will be paying even more as Governor Jerry Brown and the Democrats approved another 12 cents per gallon tax on the people including an increase in DMV fees as well as a $100 annual fee on zero-emission vehicles as part of their latest money grab from the people of California.

State Democrats and Brown claim the $52 billion in taxes will fix the roads right? Not so fast.  We have been down that road before with an increase in gas tax for the roads and where did that lead us? It is another game of switch-a-roo and moving the money around as they choose. They moved money from one area of the state budget and leave another area short to justify their reasons for a tax increase. Surely Brown and the Democrats would not tell the people the money was needed to fund Brown’s choo choo or that the state is spending billions to supply multiple agencies in supporting and funding programs for illegal aliens. Diverting road tax funds from the state budget creates a need where they can justify creating the largest transportation tax in the state’s history. It is all built on a lie to the people.

Only 60 percent will actually go to road projects. The first billion will fund high speed rail, assumed by some to ultimately cost $200 billion, and most of the people will never use it. Millions more will be spent on park restroom maintenance, corridors to improve animal travel, as well as millions to encourage people to visit state parks.  Another billion will be used on bike lanes, which means less lanes for traffic, and $435 million plus on an unneeded light rail system.

The people of California will pay for the lies by our misleading state representatives though a higher gas tax and fees that doesn’t carry an expiration date. This tax increase is forever. These taxes and fees will be added to our already enormous transportation cost when California drivers already pay for a “designer” gasoline that no other state uses, adding another 12 cents per gallon. These taxes add up when you add a 39 cent California excise tax with a 10 cent cap and trade fee tax collapsed into the gas price with the .18 cents federal excise taxes and not to mention the 30 to 43 cents per gallon cost each person pays in California sales tax. This has become taxation upon taxation.  The additional hidden cost will be passed down to the consumer a hidden tax as additional fees to pay for the cost of shipping at the store.

In the end, it will be the tax-paying people of California that will be hit the hardest while the Democrats and Governor Brown have given “pot holes” a whole new meaning as they continue to use and mislead the people with smoke and mirrors. Maybe they should be more concern with the people of California than making it a sanctuary state. California has a taxation problem only because the Democrats have a mismanagement problem.

Frank Aquila is president of the South San Joaquin Republicans and author of the book, “Sarah Palin Out of Nowhere.” He can be emailed at



May 3, 2017

100 Days: Trump Making America Great Again

Filed under: Uncategorized — frankaquila @ 2:48 am

President Donald Trump is leading America back to greatness. He is not a typical politician and he is not politically correct. He just believes in getting things done and running America like a business, putting successful people in the right position in his unashamed commitment of American greatness.  Trump has shown in his first 100 days that he would fulfill his promises to the electorate to make America great again and he has already accomplished an impressive list of achievements.
Trump began bringing jobs back to America before he was sworn in as president, negotiating with both Ford and Carrier to stay in America. Other companies, such as Samsung, Exxon, Fiat, and Hasbro have already begun the process of returning their businesses to America to create more American jobs. Trump signed an executive order revitalizing the coal industry and approved the Dakota Access Pipeline and the Keystone Pipeline, which will create more jobs and bring energy independence to America.

While Trump is putting American industry and the private sector to work, he is eliminating government regulations and freezing non-essential hiring throughout the federal government, including a five year ban on lobbyist. The Wall Street Journal editorial stated, “So far the Trump administration is a welcome improvement, rolling back more regulations than any president in history.”  As a result, Trump has already cut the U.S. debt burden by $68 billion while the Philly Fed Index, a survey of how well manufacturers are doing, has hit its highest level since 1984. The NFIB Small Business Optimism Index is at its highest level since 2004. Economic and consumer confidence are surging.

Trump has put America’s security as a top priority.  Illegal immigration is down 67 percent. Border Patrol and ICE are deporting criminals and “sanctuary cities” that harbor criminal illegal aliens face losing federal funding.

Trump reacted to Syria’s murder of woman and children. He sanctioned Iran over their missile program. He dropped a 21,600 pound bomb on the ISIS headquarters and training facility with many underground tunnels. Trump is building up a military while dealing with the nuclear threat of an unhinged leader in North Korea, which was enabled by former President Bill Clinton when he removed sanctions from North Korea on an empty promise not to seek nuclear weapons.

Trump selected Neil Gorsuch to the United States Supreme Court, who will defend freedom and protect America from judicial activism.

Trump signed an executive order to protect police officers, created a task force to reduce crime, and signed an executive order to target drug cartels.

Trump is working at a neck-breaking pace in just 100 days. He will reduce taxes, eliminate the burden of Obamacare, renegotiate NAFTA even while the Democrats continue to try to stop him with rogue judges or obstruction.  Trump is leading with an agenda to Make America Great Again.

Frank Aquila is president of the South San Joaquin Republicans and author of the book, “Sarah Palin Out of Nowhere.” He can be emailed at

March 18, 2017

Was Russian meddling a Smokescreen for Obama?

Filed under: Uncategorized — frankaquila @ 2:16 am

Democrats have been trying to create an impression that Russia influenced the 2016 election.  They have speculated about Trumps’s team, businesses, taxes, campaign, and Trump, himself, colluding with the Russians without providing any evidence.  They speculated that voting machines were hacked by the Russians as well as Hillary’s unsecure and illegal server, her campaign manager’s email, and the DNC without providing an ounce of evidence.

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange released emails and records were not disputed and he has stated there was no Russian connection.  Instead, he implied that Seth Conrad Rich, a Democrat staffer was the leaker.  Rich was murdered on July 20, 2016 in what was reported as a robbery gone wrong at 4:30 am.  However, his watch, wallet, and phone were still on him and bruises were found on his hands, face, and knees as a sign he had earlier fought against those tied to his murder.

While the Democrats attempted to look for ties to Russia with Trump, they ignored Hillary’s approval of 20% of American uranium sold to Russia just before millions were given to the Clinton Foundation by the Russians or the many meetings she had with the Russian ambassador, including other prominent Democrats.

After Trump began his transition to the presidency, various leaks within the government began to emerge of Trump and his staff’s private conversations.  General Flynn resigned and Trump acknowledged private conversations with various leaders were leaked to the media.

The New York Times reveled that in the final days of the Obama administration, the power of the National Security Administration, which does surveillance, were expanded.  The New York Times also reported a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (FISA) warrant was sought in June to examine “U.S. persons in Donald Trump’s campaign.” That request was denied; but a request in October was granted by three judges appointed by President Clinton after evidence was presented possibly related to the Trump campaign and its alleged links to two Russian banks.

A FISA warrant is a criminal warrant to do surveillance, which means the sitting president of the incumbent party was investigating the presidential candidate and his campaign.

To prevent American fingerprints, the Obama administration used GCHQ, which is the official British spying agency to monitor Trump and his associates with access to the NSA database.  Three intelligence sources and the British have confirmed they assisted the Obama administration and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

If all is true, American citizens had illegal surveillance.  Further complicating matters, Hillary Clinton, as a private citizen, received such information from the Obama administration, which immediately used the information for her benefit.  These are arrestable offenses of high crimes.

Further, President Obama received the action between his attorney general and the FBI on the FISA surveillance in his daily intelligence briefing.

All along, Americans have been duped to believe the Russians were colluding with the Trump campaign without a shred of evidence.  Now, it is beginning to appear the Russian hoax was a smokescreen to cover up the activity of surveillance against Trump and his campaign by the Obama administration.

Frank Aquila is president of the South San Joaquin Republicans and author of the book, “Sarah Palin Out of Nowhere.”  He can be emailed at

February 3, 2017

Keeping America Safe

Filed under: Uncategorized — frankaquila @ 6:47 pm

Keeping America Safe

President Trump swore to protect and defend Americans by keeping them safe from terrorism.  The previous administration had identified seven nations that were either sponsors of terrorism or are controlled by terrorists, including ISIS and Al-Queda.  Yet, those nations – Iraq, Iran, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Libya, and Sudan – had refugees approved to come to America without know who they were.

ISIS sent messages to their militants to use the refugee program to hide their militants among the refugees to commit terrorists’ attacks in Europe and to come to America.  Trump was not going to jeopardize American lives and therefore put a 90 day temporary ban on those nations to find a plan to be assured no terrorists are coming to America by improving the screening process to keep America safe.  It is the Democrats and Obama who are responsible for creating the refugee crisis through the vacuum created in Iraq when America left Iraq forcing the Iraqi government to release thousands of violent criminals and thugs from prison, which formed ISIS.

Democrats emerged from their swamp of hypocrisy to protest this travel ban, despite knowing past presidents have used travel bans on immigrants.  Obama had used the travel ban 19 separate times, including a six month travel ban on Iraqi refugees in 2011 and most recently a travel ban on Cuban refugees, stranding legal Cuban travelers just a month ago.  There were no protests or tears against Obama’s travel ban.  I can assume Democrat leader Chuck Schumer forgot his statement in November 2015 that a refugee pause “may be necessary” as tears swelled up in his own eyes.

The fake news media pushed the narrative calling Trump’s ban a “Muslim ban” when only seven of the 57 identified Muslim nations were affected.  The Democrat aligned media called the ban “unconstitutional” despite knowing that 16 current Democrat U.S. Senators and 57 Democrat Representatives were part of a unanimous vote in 2002 that passed the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Reform Act restricting non-immigrant visas from countries designated as state sponsors of terror following the attack on September 11, 2001.  This law is still a Federal Law: 8 U.S. Code 1735.  Trump had legal right and authority to enforce the law for security.  The Democrats used their own theater to persuade public opinion and promote protests against President Trump claiming his actions were “unconstitutional” knowing full well he has legal authority through their own vote and previous actions by other presidents.

Opponents filed an appeal for a temporary ban to U.S District Judge James Robart in Seattle, who granted their appeal.  Harvard Law Professor, Alan Dershowitz, who is an admitted liberal, disagreed with the ruling stating the U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled the U.S. Constitution does not protect non-citizens; therefore the ruling is an “uphill climb” for those states.

Still, those protestors who came with their cardboard signs and expressed their tears against the ban were never there for the 140 police officers killed in the line of duty in 2016.  There were no tears for the 424,000 unemployed veterans or the 39,471 homeless veterans.  No, only rage and tears for 109 travelers who were inconvenience and verified before their release; even though over 325,000 people traveled to America that weekend.

I am sure each of those protestors locks their doors at night not because they don’t love the people outside; but because they love the people inside and want to keep them safe.

President Trump believes a nation without borders is not a nation.  He believes it is better to prevent a terrorist attack on America rather than responding to a terrorist attack on America.  Trump loves Americans and wants to keep America safe.

Frank Aquila is president of the South San Joaquin Republicans and author of the book, “Sarah Palin Out of Nowhere.  He can be emailed at

January 29, 2017

Mexico’s Law more

Filed under: Uncategorized — frankaquila @ 12:40 am

Mexico’s Law more strict than Trump

President Trump has been called a “racist” and  “unsympathetic” toward illegal aliens.  Really?

How does Mexico treat those entering their country illegally?

According to Mexico’s immigration laws, Article 32 states you must speak Spanish and must be a professional who is useful to the Mexican society.  There are no bilingual programs in the school and no pressing 2 for English.  All business must be conducted in Spanish.  Investors are welcome; but must pay higher than minimum wage and your land purchases are restricted.  Article 34 states that foreigners must have the necessary funds to support themselves and their dependents.  There are no welfare programs, food stamps, government housing or entitlements.

Article 87 states foreigners must be “physically and mentally healthy.” Articles 73, 85, 86, 87 state foreigners must be on a national population registry, cooperating with federal local, and municipal police.  Article 116 states foreigners using fake documents face a fine and imprisonment.  Immigrants must show birth certificate to show citizenship and must have identification when voting.  Articles 117-121 state foreigners who fail to obey laws will be fined, deported, and felons imprisoned.   No one is allowed to enter the country with a criminal record. There is no due process of deportation.  There is no 14th Amendment.  Law enforcement officers are required to enforce Mexico’s immigration laws at all times.  Articles 123-126 make illegal immigration a felony.  Articles 127 state any Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner is subject to five years in prison.

The government of Mexico benefits from American policies since criminals and their poor flee to America for many free benefits and a safe haven provided for them.

President Trump’s policies are much kinder.  He wants to prevent criminals, terrorist, gang members, drug cartels, and human traffickers from entering America.  He wants to reduce the tax burden on the American taxpayer, which according to is $383 Billion Dollars annually for healthcare, education, incarceration, and social services.  This is far more than the one-time payment of $10 Billion to build a wall and far less than the $140 Billion Obama gave to Iran.

President Trump is for legal immigration and hears the voices of victims that are suffering from the hand of criminals here illegally, who find refuge in sanctuary cities.  These sanctuary cities undermine our rule of law to protect criminals and provide them benefits while many Americans live in poverty and struggle to find jobs.  Maybe the mayors of sanctuary cities can provide the same love for the families of veterans.  If not, they are welcome to move to Mexico where the immigration laws are much stricter.  However, don’t call the president of Mexico a “racist” or you may end up in jail or worse – never to be heard from again!

Frank Aquila is president of the South San Joaquin Republicans and author of the book, “Sarah Palin Out of Nowhere.”  He can be emailed at

January 11, 2017

Federal Voter Protection Act

Filed under: Uncategorized — frankaquila @ 2:52 am

Federal Voter Protection Act


According to the Pew Research Center, one out of eight registered voters (24 million) are invalid in America.  There are 1.8 million dead voters, 2.75 million voters in multiple states, and 12 million with invalid addresses.  Already there have been multiple cases of voter fraud prior to the election including fake and dead people being registered to vote.  A woman who died in 2008 has voted five times since her death.  A woman in Florida was found in possession of several absentee ballots for Hispanic voters whom were deaf, blind, or had Alzheimer’s.

When I voted in the last election, I was not required to provide any identification to vote since California does not require it.  All I had to say was a name and address.  I could have easily stated any registered voter’s name and address and I would have been allowed to vote for that person.  The following states require no identification to vote:  California, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont, West Virginia, Wyoming, and Washington, D.C.   The majority of these states have voted Democrat in past elections with Nevada, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania mentioned as swing states with evidence of voter fraud.

Several years ago, I met a man who told me that he was trained in “voter impersonation” in a coordinated effort to commit voter fraud for the Democrats Party before he became a Republican.  He told me the Democrats would do polling to target voters and gather information on the likelihood that the voter would not be voting for any number or reasons in the upcoming election, including if the voter had moved or was recently deceased.  The Democrat Party would then verify the information by physically visiting the residence.  The information was gathered to identify registered voters as “safe voters” to have a fraudulent voter use those names and addresses since no voter identification was required.  These fraudulent voters would go to a number of precincts or even to other nearby states with lists of assigned “safe voters” to vote in their name.  If the name happened to be removed from the voter precinct, they were instructed to fill out a “provisional ballot” with the voter’s name without consequence or verification needed.  With early voting, they could vote for a number of individuals using a name and address without ever having the suspicion of being caught or detected.

Prior to the 2016 presidential election, a number of undercover journalists, organized by James O’Keefe, from Project Veritas revealed a conspiracy to commit violence, intimidation, and voter fraud.  Some Trump events had financial backing from groups collaborating with the DNC and George Soros to create violence at Trump campaign events to create the perception that Trump supporters were violent, causing the public to be outraged with Trump in an effort to sway and intimidate voters away from supporting Trump.  I have supplied two of the four videos links.

The Hillary campaign funded the Democrat National Committee (DNC) to pay Democracy Partners, a political consulting company founded by Bob Creamer.  Creamer then funded the Foval group, headed by Scott Foval, to organize violence at Trump events and rallies to coordinate a perception that Trump supporters were violent.

Creamer, who is a convicted felon for bank fraud, was the financial organizer for the operation.  According to White House records, he was a guest at the White House 342 times and met directly with President Obama 45 times.  In one hidden camera video, filmed at Creamer’s Washington, D.C. office, Creamer explains that Hillary Clinton was aware of “all” of his activities, directly or indirectly, and that Democracy Partners has a daily conference call with the Clinton campaign, as well as frequent calls with the White House.

On another video, Scott Foval, from the Foval group, states “The campaign (Hillary Clinton campaign) pays the DNC, DNC pays Democracy Partners, Democracy Partners pays the Foval group, Foval group goes and executes the shit on the ground” to agitate and start disruptions to get bad press at Trump and Pence events. Foval continues, “We have to be careful because what we don’t need is for it to show up on CNN that the DNC paid ‘X’ people to..that’s not going to happen.”

In another video, Foval admits to several ways to commit voter fraud with the guidance of Creamer without getting caught in their effort to rig an election.  Foval states, “We manipulate the votes with money and action, not with laws.”  Foval and Creamer coordinated with each other in a number of voter fraud scams including businesses writing checks to fake people and using the check stub as identification to vote in states that required voter identification. Those states that do not require voter identification would make the voter fraud much easier.

Foval admits that those committing voter fraud are not bused in but use their own vehicle to vote in multiple precincts and across state lines to vote for multiple voters that were previously screened as not voting for various reasons.

After the release of videos by Project Veritas, Creamer and Foval have “stepped aside” from their Democrat position.

The Democrats are also trying to change the rules by allowing felons to vote.  Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe, along with other Democrats, has attempted to allow felons to restore their voting rights. He ignored his state’s supreme court ruling and illegally gave 60,000 felons voter registration cards.

In California, there has been an attempt to allow youth to vote advertised as getting youth to participate in an election with their vote being a percentage of those 18 years or older.  Two cities in Maryland allow youth to vote at 16 years and some states are considering lowering the age to vote.

According to over 3 million illegal immigrants cast votes in the 2016 presidential election. The organization’s founder Gregg Phillips said they reached that number after analyzing a whopping 180 million voter registrations from across the country.   Voter fraud had been a major concern heading into this election, especially after President Obama encouraged illegal immigrants to vote without fear of legal consequences.  It is suspected there are numerous cases of voter fraud by illegal aliens in several states.  When eleven states now provide driver’s license to illegal aliens, there is nothing stopping illegal aliens from registering to vote according to this report by Bill O’Rielly on Fox News.

“I probably arrested more than a thousand illegal aliens in my career,” retired ICE Special-Agent-In-Charge Claude Arnold said during an interview with Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly. “I routinely encounter people in possession of voter registration cards… I would ask them, ‘Do you or have you voted?’ And often, I would get the answer, yes,” he said, adding that about 100 illegal aliens told him that they had voted.

He continued stating these illegal aliens were able to vote by obtaining fraudulent documents such as a counterfeit resident alien card or work authorization card, plus a counterfeit driver’s license, and a counterfeit Social Security card.

According to reporters at the “Daily Mail,” voting experts have stated it’s certain that illegal aliens, non-citizens, and other ineligible people did vote in significant numbers on Election Day

In 2013, Jesse Richman, a professor at Old Dominion University, conducted a study based on a report by the Cooperative Congressional Election Studies, which asked respondents for citizen status and whether they had voted.  Based on the data, Richman estimated that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in the 2008 presidential election, which would translate to around 1.2 million votes. The number of non-citizens may have been more in 2016 considering Obama gave an evasive response in a YouTube interview suggesting that any voter fraud by illegal aliens would not be prosecuted under his administration.

In California, an honest vote has been taken over by a powerful Democrat party.  This should serve as a warning to Republicans as the model for what the Democrat party would like to do for the rest of America.  They have pandered to Hispanics and even assured illegal aliens a right to vote.  By 2020, every registered voter will automatically receive mail-in-ballots where anyone can be registered to vote.  The criminal class will rule and those who oppose will be ruled out.  Honest voters will become frustrated and not even vote.  California, and the nation with the Democrats in control, will be ruled by a one-party system. “It’s time to modernize the voting process,” said Democratic state Sen. Robert Hertzberg of Los Angeles, a co-sponsor. “We need to provide the same convenience and flexibility (people) have in other areas of their lives.”  Democrats don’t mind saying “convenience” and “flexibility” to create more loophole for voter fraud.

In North Carolina, their voter ID law was ruled unconstitutional by three Democrat appointed judges, two from Obama and one from Clinton.  Gov. Pat McCrory stated, “Photo IDs are required to purchase Sudafed, cash a check, board an airplane or enter a federal courtroom.” “Yet three Democratic judges are undermining the integrity of our elections while also maligning our state.”

As a result, McCrory lost a close re-election campaign despite questions of voter fraud.  Officials acknowledged “overly similar” handwriting on several hundred absentee ballots in Bladen County.  Campaign official Ricky Diaz cited evidence suggesting potentially similar situations in other counties.  If several people were to coordinate an effort throughout several counties or states, it could have an impact on determining the outcome of an election locally, statewide, or nationally if it affects the Electoral College totals.

In Nevada, Republican Assembly Candidate, Stan Vaughan, had actual proof of the massive voter fraud in his Clark County district.  A total number of 17,086 votes were cast in the District for both Republican and Democrat candidates. However, when confirmation letters were sent to the voters in the District, the US postal service returned mail from 9,200 of these voters.

Vaughn found that many of the people who are listed as deceased are still on the active voter rolls. Many of the returned mail came back with 5 people living in a vacant lot with no mail receptacle.  Edward Snowden, Willie Nelson, Waylon Jennings and dozens of movie stars were registered to vote in District 15 according to Mr. Vaughan.

Donald Trump lost Nevada by only 27,000 votes statewide.  So 9,200 fraudulent voters in one small Assembly district is more than 1/3 of the total margin that Trump lost by.

It was also reported that Nevada poll workers wore defeat-Trump t-shirts at the polls during the election which was against the law and Hillary supporters were caught breaking the law before the election when registering people to vote as well.

In Pennsylvania, there were 20,736 absentee ballots cast, which 18,467 went to Clinton.  This is highly suspicious with other serious voting irregularities.

In Wisconsin, parts of their voter ID law were also ruled unconstitutional by Judge James D. Peterson, who was also appointed by Obama.  Later, a Hillary Clinton surrogate bragged on camera about coordinating voter fraud with “impersonating voters” at multiple polling places.

In Indiana, a massive absentee ballot scam is being investigated in 56 counties.


In Virginia, the Public Interest Legal Foundation discovered 1,046 non-citizens on the voter rolls in just the eight counties that responded to their request.


There are many more cases of suspected voter fraud throughout America with several states investigating voter fraud.  The coordinated effort to create voter fraud has really elevated to a form of art.  Some of those committing voter frauds are so blatantly proud of their success and creativity; they can’t resist gloating about their criminal behavior on camera.  However, much voter fraud goes undetected and you have several states who deny the existence of voter fraud.  They cite the lack of conviction, at the same time turning a blind eye to the corruption and crime taking place due to their own political beneficiary. These states are primarily run by Democrats and they will accuse anyone attempting to question voter fraud with racism in their quest to silence their opposition.

It has also been revealed that voter fraud was occurring through voting machines.  Wikileaks has revealed the Hillary campaign wanted to “make Soros happy” referring to Communist billionaire, George Soros who provides much financial support to the DNC and Democrat groups.  Voting machines in 16 states from Smartmatic have ties to George Soros.  Chairman Mark Malloch-Brown is on the board of Soros’ Open Society Foundation.  It was reported that voting machines have changed Republican votes to Democrat votes.


Computer programmer Clinton Eugene Curtis testified under oath in court and in Congress in March 2016 that he was hired by authorities to help rig the outcome of U.S. elections. He made software for voting machines that would give the desired results.  “It would flip the vote” to whomever you want to win by the desired results without any election official ever detecting the software.  When questioned, he stated, “They’d never see it.” The only way you can actually see the real vote is actually counting the votes against the receipt of the voting machine.

In Michigan, the recount effort started by Jill Stein exposed discrepancies in 392 precincts in what looks like systemic election fraud in Detroit.  Sixty percent of the precincts in Wayne County had to be disqualified from the statewide recount due to “irregularities” when ballot boxes were found with broken seals, an indicator that ballots were either added, removed, or swapped out.  In 20 Detroit precincts there were fewer ballots than were recorded by poll workers, including one precinct which had 50 ballots; but 306 ballots recorded. 

This can account for several voting precincts nationwide that have voter turnout beyond 100% of those registered to vote.

Detroit’s election director, Daniel Baxter, attempted to explain the voting machines were jammed causing poll workers to remove and reinsert the same ballots, resulting in many ballots being counted multiple times.  There apparently is a lot more than sheepishly claiming “human error” in these cities ran by Democrats.  They will deny and minimize voter fraud because they are the one behind it.  With 95% of the votes cast in these precincts for Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump would have won Michigan by a much higher margin than what was originally recorded.

According to Fox News judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano, those irregularities look “organized” and “government involved.”  He continued, “That is a different kind of fraud because that is the government defrauding itself.”  “The poll worker is an employee of, or a volunteer in behalf of the government. You’re talking about a crime now. … The law guarantees fair elections — not perfect ones. If this had changed the outcome, it would be unfair and it would warrant a serious inquiry.”

Election workers in several states have been caught on hidden cameras stuffing the ballot box with votes in a series of video.

Another video provided by Project Veritas showed workers destroying Republican ballots and explaining how to commit voter fraud.

The Houston-based True The Vote, an organization dedicated to stopping voter fraud, has identified 160 counties across 19 states with more registered voters on their rolls than eligible live voters.

“True the Vote absolutely supports President-elect Trump’s recent comment about the impact of illegal voting, as reflected in the national popular vote,” the group said in a statement. “We are still collecting data and will be for several months, but our intent is to publish a comprehensive study on the significant impact of illegal voting in all of its many forms and begin a national discussion on how voters, states, and the Trump Administration can best address this growing problem.”

Voter fraud is very real. Anyone who tells you otherwise is either benefitting from it or is simply foolish.  The Democrats will stop at nothing to steal an election including the use of violence, intimidation, and several forms of voter fraud.

As Americans, we want fair elections.  The law guarantees fair elections; but the evidence overwhelmingly proves that the Democrat Party has rigged the system and we have only a small window of opportunity to fix this problem.  If we fail to seize this opportunity to fix this problem, the Democrat Party will assure their power in the future with no means of repairing again.

We cannot resist the urge to rest on our laurels and be content that voter fraud is no big deal simply because Trump won despite it.  This is about more than just one election. It’s about our future and stopping what the Democrats are willing to do to secure their victory in future elections.

Voter fraud can have an effect on the course of history from our local elections to state elections to federal elections controlling Congress, the U.S. Senate, Governors, and the outcome of an election through our Electoral College, determining the presidency.

The Democrats have called on the abolishment of the Electoral College and some states have already wrote law requiring the Electoral Votes to be granted to the individual who won the popular vote in an effort to undermined the election process founded by our US Constitution.

We need to assure that our voting system is fair by establishing federal guidelines throughout the states.  Democrats will oppose and do everything in their power to have control, even through criminally stealing an election from the people.  However, with President Trump, a Republican Congress, the Senate, and with a slightly conservative U.S Supreme Court, we must provide a law protecting all votes in future elections from voter fraud and criminal activity.


A Federal Voter Protection Act must preserve and protect the integrity of American’s voting rights by providing minimal standards throughout each state through the following:

  1. Require all states to require photo identification when voting.

Americans are required to show identification to get a library book, get medication, board an airplane, write a check, or attend the Democrat National Convention.  So why is it so hard to show identification when voting?  Except in very rare situations, every person has photo identification to verify who they are through their name and address.  Most states, if not all, provide photo identification card for individuals who request them.

The purpose of photo identification isn’t done to violate an individual’s privacy; it’s requested by others as protection from fraud, theft and terrorism.  By the same standards, we must do a better job protecting our polling places to prevent various forms of voter fraud including “voter impersonation” of those who have moved, are deceased, or have made it known their desire not to vote.  You can’t prove someone is committing voter fraud if you don’t know the person’s true identity.

Under the 1965 Voting Rights Act, the attorney general has the right of approval for any proposed voting change in a state with a history of voter discrimination.  This was originally targeted toward southern states.

Obama’s Justice Department rejected a new photo ID voting law passed in Texas, concluding that between 6 and 10.8 percent of Hispanics in that state lacked the required picture identification. In passing the law, Texas pledged to give out free ID cards to those who didn’t have one. The Justice Department rejected that idea because applicants for the free cards would have to provide a birth certificate.

We have a lot of rights here in America, but they come with responsibilities. You have the right to own a car and the privilege to drive if you get the proper license and insurance. We often have to prove who we are to get what we want. I see no reason why that maxim doesn’t apply to our right to vote.

Much has changed since the 1965 Voting Rights Act went into effect — the pervasiveness and ease of identity theft, to name just one obvious example. The idea of requiring a picture ID at the polls was recommended in 2005 by a commission on federal election reform co-chaired by none other than former President Jimmy Carter — not a man known to be hostile to minorities or the poor.

Not only should there be photo ID, there should be a fingerprint on the back of the voter ID that can be matched with the fingerprint that they have to put next to their name when they sign in. There are machines that they can hold that fingerprint under from the driver’s license and compare it to the fingerprints on the paper.


Requiring voter identification is the first step to revamp our voting system to ensure that only eligible voters actually vote.

  1. Absentee Ballots opens the window to another type of voter fraud. Every ballot must be required to have a right thumb print associated with the ballot to verify each registered voter.  (Obviously an exception can be made for the rare number of people who may not have a right thumb.)

When Absentee Ballots are sent to registered voters, there is an increased potential for voter fraud to occur.  When you require a thumbprint to be matched with a ballot, the level of fraud will be decreased.

My researched has showed me there are several companies that make small ink pads including Alibaba and Ballot Expert.  (Note: I have no association with any company relating to ink pads and only provide this information through my research.)  These ink pads are inexpenisive and could be mailed with ballots to registered voters, especially those doing their vote through an absentee ballot.  I have attached a link to one company called Alibaba.

Certainly, those wanting to commit voter fraud will not comply with the ballot requirements.  They will either smug the ballot with a blotted thumb print or not put a thumb print at all.  Those ballots would be easy to recognize and could be set aside for verification during a contested election.  Those doing voter fraud with prints would have their prints on the ballot and those individuals would be easy to verify and be easy to prosecute.

  1. Enforce that only American citizens, who are at least 18 years old and not a felon are eligible to vote.


  1. Require all county Registrar of Voters to clean up the voter rolls with random audits from either the state and/or the federal government. (Registered voters, who are deceased, moved away, registered in multiple states, or with invalid address must be removed.)


  1. All voters must have the mental capacity to be able to vote.

No one with a medical condition such as Alzheimer’s or any mental condition deemed by a medical doctor that deems the individuals mental state unable to properly understand and reason should be allowed to vote until the medical doctor has cleared the individual.

  1. Random audits conducted by federal election workers.

To prevent federal election workers or those being in an assigned precinct from becoming aware of which federal worker would be conducting an audit, a lottery system must be set up for assignment of the federal election workers to the assigned precinct to be audited.  (This will prevent rogue election workers that would be doing the audit coordinating with various election workers at various precincts from covering voter fraud.)  If election workers are unaware who may be doing an audit or if they may be audited, they will be more inclined to be honest and not jeopardize criminal charges.

Federal audits would differ from state audits and the federal government could authorize more audits to states that do not satisfactorily conduct sufficient audits.

An audit should be conducted on any precinct where voter fraud was reported including; but not limited to those with “irregularities,” “over-voting,” reports of similar hand writings, or reports of voting machines switching votes.

A phone number to report voter fraud should be posted at every voting precinct and on all voter ballot material.

A federal audit must include a scan of all thumb prints on ballots through new technology for verification and to determine no fraud had occurred with multiple suspicious ballots.

A federal audit would include verification that the number of ballots is the same as the number recorded by election workers.

A federal audit would include physically contacting random voters for verification and mailing confirmation letters to various addresses to determine the addresses are real.

A federal audit would check the computer software and physically doing a sample vote on various voting machines, especially if voter fraud had been reported in a particular precinct involving computer voting machines.

A federal audit would verify the individual who registered any voter who has been determined fictitious.

  1. Federal criminal charges with severe penalties for those prosecuted for committing, organizing, assisting or financing voter fraud or the intent to commit voter fraud.


  1. Federal criminal charges with severe penalties to coordinate, assist, or finance individuals to obtain fraudulent or counterfeit identification such as a resident alien card, driver’s license, or social security card for the mean of registering or assisting the individual to vote.

This must include those who establish fraudulent individuals with paystubs as a form of identification through a business as a mean of providing identification to vote or be registered to vote.

  1. Require that all voting machines should have an independent contractor with anti-hacking software and software that would prevent changes in the voting results.


  1. Federal criminal charges with severe penalties for those who coordinate, organize, participate, advertise, assist, or conspire to commit violence or intimidation at campaign events.


  1. Require all counties to cooperate with non-government organization’s audits as with the Freedom of Information Act to allow those organizations to conduct their own audits at their cost, such as the Public Interest Legal Foundation or True The Vote.


  1. Require that states not be allowed to amend or undermine the Electoral College process by stating their Electoral Votes would go only to the candidate who wins the popular vote. The Electoral Voting process must be the same through all the states.


  1. Federal Law with several penalties to anyone who threatens, persuades, or bribes an Elector to change his or her vote.


  1. Expect the Attorney General to enforce all laws governing voter fraud and to sue any state, such as California, for promoting voter fraud through its faulty interpretation of the National Voting Rights Act. (California Secretary of State, Alex Padilla, makes it clear on his website that Registrar of Voters are to “treat as normal” and “enter on the voter rolls” those who have failed to affirm they are U.S. citizens on the voter registration card.)


  1. Any future technology changes in our voting system must have safeguards to assure verification of the identity of the registered voter.

In conclusion, we must restore integrity to our election process and stop the criminal forces from stealing elections from honest Americans.  America is the most technically advanced country in the world; yet, we have not assured our voting system is free from many types of voter fraud.   A Federal Voter Protection Act will provide the minimal guidelines, standards, and safeguards for the states to assure the American people their vote will be fairly counted.

December 24, 2016

Will Trump govern as a Conservative?

Filed under: Uncategorized — frankaquila @ 4:40 pm

A friend has challenged me to prove that Donald Trump will govern as a conservative.  I have taken this challenge to highlight some key points; but first, I must admit that I originally supported Ted Cruz for president due to some concerns I had on some positions Trump had taken prior to his declared candidacy for president.  Now, it is difficult to comprise a list prior to the man becoming president; but looking at his agenda and those people he has selected, I can make a good argument on his behalf.

  1. Pence – Trump had to gain confidence with conservatives and his number one pick was to bring in Governor Mike Pence as his running mate. Pence was also a Cruz supporter; but has taken control and may become one of the most influential vice presidents ever.
  2. Supreme Court – Trump was not shy about the type of justices he would nominate to the US Supreme Court. With Justice Antonin Scalia’s passing, the direction of the court weighed on the next president.  Trump has comprised a list of 21 conservative justices who would carry the torch of representing the US Constitution for years to come.
  3. Attorney General Jeff Sessions – A staunch conservative who will fight against corruption in a non-partisan way.
  4. Ben Carson – Sec of Housing and Urban Development. This man came out of the ghetto of Detroit to become one of the most successful individuals in American history.  A Christian conservative who believes in working hard to become all you can be.
  5. Tom Price – Sec of Health and Human Services. He has been the biggest critic of Obamacare and as a physician; he will lay the groundwork for the repeal.
  6. Betsy DeVos – Sec of Education – She has been a supporter of state rights for Education and providing competition for education through Charter Schools and voucher programs for those in areas of struggling schools.
  7. Homeland protection – With Generals John Kelly (Homeland Security), Michael Flynn (National Security Advisor) and James Mattis (Sec of Defense), I can not think of a great list of advisors in the ear of Trump to keep America safe.
  8. Scott Pruit – Sec of EPA – There is no one better to run the EPA than the man who is suing the EPA. This is my most ironic pick.  He will move to get rid of so many regulations that are hurting our country.
  9. Rick Perry – Sec of Energy. Perry has actually called for the elimination of the Energy Dept.  This dept should actually be the Dept of non-Energy.  They do not create energy but only place regulations to limit energy.
  10. Mick Mulvaney – Office of Management and Budget. This Tea Party supporter who supports the conservative House Freedom Caucus and led the effort to force out House Speaker John Boehner.  Trump said,  “Mulvaney has long been a strong voice in Congress for reining in out-of-control spending, fighting government waste and enacting tax policies that will allow working Americans to thrive.”
  11. Stephen Bannon – Chief Strategist. A man that I had the pleasure of speaking to in the past.  The strategist and campaign manager behind Trump winning.  A conservative businessman, media executive, navy officer, and banker.  He has connections and his news corporation of Breitbart  News provided conservatives with the actual truth away from the liberal media.
  12. A hiring freeze on all federal employees to reduce federal workforce through attrition (exempting military, public safety, and public health).
  13. A requirement that for every new federal regulation, two existing regulations must be eliminated.
  14. A 5 year-ban on White House and Congressional officials becoming lobbyists after they leave government service and a ban on White House officials lobbying on behalf of a foreign government with a complete ban on foreign lobbyists raising money for American elections.
  15. Renegotiate NAFTA with our withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
  16. Begin vital energy infrastructure projects like the Keystone Pipeline.
  17. Cancel every unconstitutional executive action, memorandum and order issued by President Obama.
  18. Cancel all federal funding to Sanctuary Cities
  19. Begin removing the more than 2 million criminal illegal immigrants from the country and cancel visas to foreign countries that won’t take them back
  20. Suspend immigration from terror-prone regions where vetting cannot safely occur. All vetting of people coming into our country will be considered extreme vetting.
  21. Reduction in Taxes.
  22. Create a Task Force On Violent Crime and increasing funding for programs that train and assist local police; increases resources for federal law enforcement agencies and federal prosecutors to dismantle criminal gangs and put violent offenders behind bars.
  23. Rebuilds our military by eliminating the defense sequester and expanding military investment.
  24. Provide our veterans with the ability to receive public VA treatment or attend the private doctor of their choice.

This is by no means everything.  I did not mention the wall, which Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan is against.  Trump will not only need to fight Democrats, he will need to fight those in his own party.  Trump most likely will not be able to get everything done; but if he were to get 80% done, I will be happy as a conservative.  There are many people in his ear; but I like most of those he has put within shouting distance to keep him focused on a conservative agenda.

Frank Aquila is president of the South San Joaquin Republicans and author of the book, “Sarah Palin Out of Nowhere.”  He can be emailed at

« Previous PageNext Page »

Create a free website or blog at